I switch between Claude Code and Codex every day.
This is a vibe coding post classified by AGK Intelligence as Agent infra & costs (a tool drop), kept by the Vibe Coding Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
I switch between Claude Code and Codex every day. Every switch, I explain my project again. Same repo. Same decisions. New model, zero memory. @livingbrain keeps the memory outside the model, so the next tool already knows. LLMs have parameters. Living Brain has plasticity. Should memory belong to the model or to you?
Posted by Daniel Smidstrup (14.5k followers) 2 days ago · 31 likes · 1.3k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the Vibe Coding Radar as Agent infra & costs.
More vibe coding work like this
- The tricky part of sandboxing is often what happens at the boundary with the host. — @AgenticAIFdn
- 575 - Eight or nine repos running at once, and one agent kept dragging memories from the… — @PowerBITips
- If you want to learn how to build self-improving harnesses, check out this paper. — @dair_ai
- Build an agent on @onkeiki to answer your customers while you sleep. — @orchid_hq
- how do you stop 20+ agents from colliding on the same client work? — @webjuice_ie
- Brilliant paper on optimizing agent environments. — @dair_ai
- Docker is one box. The coding agent can run in others, and switching is one line 🧰 — @marcelotryle
- Holy f*cking sh*t... everyone upgrades Claude and nobody builds the harness — @gippp69
Every post is read and classified by AGK Intelligence: what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 7.9k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 14 days, 2.6k tools, 12 markets. New posts are collected several times an hour and the full ranking is recomputed every hour — last update 2026-11-06 16:53 UTC. Full method.